Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 116-121.doi: 10.16382/ j.cnki.1000-5579.2016.01.013

• 语言学研究 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

On the Incompatibility of Plural Marker “Men” with Numerals: From the Perspective of the Distinctions of Chinese-English Number Categories

SANG Zi-Hong   

  • Online:2016-01-15 Published:2016-03-02
  • Contact: SANG Zi-Hong
  • About author:SANG Zi-Hong

Abstract: This paper discusses the incompatibility of plural marker “men” with numerals in Chinese from a cross-linguistic perspective between Chinese and English. It comes to a conclusion that “men” is both an addictive plural marker and an associative plural marker. As an addictive plural marker, noun phrases plus “men” doesn’t refer to atomic members and is consequently incompatible with a numeral which signifies an exact number. When “men” is an associative plural marker, the heterogeneity between members in the set it refers to causes the failure of counting due to the fact that counting is based on homogeneity. In contrast, English plural marker “-s” entails general numbers including singulars and plurals so that it is compatible with numbers. While “-s” implies both singulars and plurals, “men” is a real plural marker which exclusively refers to plurals.

Key words: addictive plural丨associative plural丨general number丨&ldquo, men&rdquo, 丨&ldquo, -s&rdquo